---
title: "I don’t really know what the term ‘performance management' means | Crewmojo"
description: "You might ask what the heck have I been doing for the last 10 years... Bear with me, you might feel the same as I do."
source: https://www.crewmojo.com/newsletter/i-dont-know-what-the-term-performance-management-means
published: 2024-11-28
generated: 2026-11-10
---

[All newsletter posts](https://www.crewmojo.com/newsletter)

# I don’t really know what the term ‘performance management' means

[Mark Lewis](https://www.crewmojo.com/authors/mark-lewis)28 November 2024

## I don’t really know what the term  ‘performance management’ means.

I don’t know the purpose of **performance reviews**.

I’m unsure what a **development plan** looks like.

I don’t know the ideal **goal-cycle**.

Yet, these are terms I use everyday.

You might ask what the heck have I been doing for the last 10 years... Bear with me.

‍

‍

I can’t define exactly what many HR terms actually mean, or what other people mean when they say them to me.

Now obviously I get the **essence** of all this HR lingo.

I’ve been able to **infer meanings** from years of HR-oriented conversations.

But, sometimes I still find myself on a **different page**.

For example, I’ll say **performance management** and some people respond talking about a ‘**PIP**’.

And sometimes I’m corrected from using a ‘**dirty**’ word like performance ‘**management**’ which is swapped for ‘**enablement**’.

But ‘**managers**’ are ‘**coaches**’... or ‘**leaders**’? Or should that be **enablers**!

## How can we build effective performance management without a common HR language?

No, I’m not going to try and re-write HR’s vocabulary.

But, I am going to share an **alternate** approach.

A way that I think is far more **human** and **intuitive**, which enables us to master performance management, without ‘**properly**’ understanding any of those terms.

This is the way I taught myself **before I knew anything about HR processes**.

It’s the way I built a high-performing team that out-competed companies way more resourced than we were.

And it’s the way we build Crewmojo today.

It can be boiled down to **3 simple bullet points**.

I believe all other components of employee performance are downstream from these ideas.

And if you truly live them, **you don’t need to worry about all the terminology**.

## Let's dive in:

1.  Employee performance is  nothing more than **how well an employee completes their work**.
2.  Your ability to get the best from an employee is directly correlated with **how well you set the environment up for their success**.
3.  The more you **increase these two metrics (employee capability + success conditions)**, the higher performance will be.

If you create **a people experience that addresses the demands of those 3 points**, but do nothing else in terms of formal HR processes, then it really won’t matter because you’ll have a high-performing team anyway.

Another thing that is really cool when we think from this lens. We come from a **first principles** approach.

-   You can strip away all the stuff that you're told you ‘**should**’ be doing.
-   You can **design** performance from the ground up, for your organization.
-   You can implement only tools and processes that **add value and make sense**.

No longer are you forcing a square peg into a round hole.

Anything you can think of that will **deliver this end goal** is on the table.

And that is how you develop your unique, but **simple and effective approach to high-performance**.

‍

Want to talk through what this looks like for your organisation?

[Book a demo](https://www.crewmojo.com/demo)

Get the newsletter

Ideas and practices for organisations rethinking performance, straight to your inbox.

Email address

Subscribe

You're subscribed. Look out for our next newsletter.
